Last week, a federal judge in Washington handed the gun industry a painful legal setback in its efforts to prevent the Obama Administration from attacking the highly-profitable trafficking of assault rifles to the Mexican drug cartels.

Judge Rosemary Collyer – who, incidentally, was appointed by George W. Bush — upheld the Administration’s new policy of requiring federally-licensed gun dealers in four border states to notify federal law enforcement authorities whenever there is a multiple purchase of certain semi-automatic rifles. Judge Collyer found this modest reporting requirement “reasonable” in light of evidence that “certain powerful long guns are weapons of choice of Mexican drug cartels” and “multiple sales of such guns is a strong indicator of gun trafficking.”

The industry’s reaction was a study in hypocrisy. The National Shooting Sports Foundation – the industry trade association that brought the lawsuit – issued a statement expressing its disappointment in the ruling, but emphasizing that “members of the firearms industry take great pride in their longstanding cooperative relationship” with the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. Yes, the industry is so “cooperative” that it took the ATF to court because retailers could not abide having to tell ATF when someone walks out of a Texas gun shop with ten semi-automatic assault rifles. I guess it’s easy to be “cooperative” with ATF until the Bureau actually requires you to cooperate to fight gun trafficking.

The industry’s strategy of contesting the reporting rule in court has clearly backfired. The gun industry has enthusiastically joined the National Rifle Association in denying that U.S. gun dealers are a primary source of guns for the Mexican cartels. Ironically, the industry’s own lawsuit has given the government an opportunity to present the full range of evidence that the cartels are arming themselves with American guns, evidence the industry was unable to overcome.

For example, Judge Collyer cited a General Accountability Office report concluding that a “large proportion of the firearms fueling Mexican drug violence originated in the United States, including a growing number of increasingly lethal weapons.” Judge Collyer relied on actual crime gun traces indicating that over 20,000 firearms seized by Mexican authorities and traced between 2004 and 2008 originated in the United States, mostly from the border states. This is likely a vast undercount since not all crime guns seized in Mexico are traced. Contrary to the gun lobby’ s denial of reality, Judge Collyer found that “the states bordering Mexico have been shown to be major sources of guns related to crime in Mexico.”

Indeed, the gun lobby has so distanced itself from reality on the issue of gun trafficking to Mexico that it now claims that the ATF’s misguided “Fast and Furious” operation, in which ATF allowed some 2,000 guns to move from the U.S. to the cartels in an effort to get at cartel leaders, was itself a conspiracy to justify the rifle reporting rule. In the paranoid universe of the gun lobby, there was no trafficking of guns to Mexico until ATF authorized it during the Obama Administration to justify more gun restrictions.

This absurd theory struggles to explain the fact that the Bush Administration used similarly flawed tactics to combat the tidal wave of guns moving to Mexico long before the “Fast and Furious” operation was implemented.   Given that “Fast and Furious” has come under fire because ATF may have allowed guns to “walk” into Mexico, it is odd that the NRA and the gun industry would object to a reporting requirement that would enable ATF to better stop trafficked guns before they get to the border.

Let’s face it. Although there are some gun dealers responsible enough to voluntarily inform the authorities about suspicious transactions, the industry is dominated by manufacturers, distributors and retailers who profit so handsomely from high-volume sales to traffickers that they will fight any serious effort to curtail them. In Judge Collyer’s ruling, the industry’s hypocrisy is laid bare for all to see.

Dennis Henigan is the Acting President of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence and the author of Lethal Logic: Exploding the Myths That Paralyze American Gun Policy (Potomac Books 2009).

Family and friends of Christina-Taylor Green lit candles during a private ceremony at the family farm, where she was born

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. once observed that “Darkness cannot drive out darkness. Only light can do that.” On Sunday, the sad first anniversary of the Tucson shooting, many thousands of Americans joined together to light candles of remembrance and protest against the darkness of gun violence.

They lit candles of remembrance for the six killed in Tucson, including 9-year-old Christina-Taylor Green. They lit candles of remembrance and hope for the thirteen who were injured but survived, including the courageous Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, who summoned the strength to lead the Pledge of Allegiance at a ceremony in Tucson. They lit candles of remembrance for all the gun violence victims in our nation’s recent history, over 500,000 murdered with guns since Dr. King fell to an assassin’s bullet in 1968.

They lit candles of protest as well. The candlelight vigil campaign, culminating in sixty-eight vigils and related events in twenty-two states and the District of Columbia on a single day, unified under the name TooManyVictims. They sent a single message. Our nation has seen many victims of gun violence. It can no longer be endured. It must stop.

They lit candles from New York City to Chicago to L.A. They lit candles from Duluth to Austin. From Reading to Columbus to Eugene. They lit them in public parks, at courthouses, at city halls, in places of worship, even at barber shops and on street corners.

They lit candles at the National Historic Site honoring the Brown v. Board of Education decision in Topeka, Kansas, where Park Rangers honored one of their own — Ranger Margaret Anderson, recently killed by gunfire in the line of duty at Mt. Rainier in Washington State.
And the victims’ voices were heard. Even those whose lives long ago were cut short by gunfire. Their loved ones stepped forward and told their stories. They told them to those who gathered with candles; they told them to the world through the Brady Campaign’s website, www.toomanyvictims.org.

The question is: Are our political leaders listening? Too many of them hear only the intimidating drumbeat of the National Rifle Association and the gun extremists the NRA represents. When a horrible shooting like Tucson happens, too many of our leaders freeze with fear – not fear for the next innocent victims that may be struck down, but fear of gun lobby political reprisal against any politician who dares to call for sanity in our nation’s gun laws.

However “difficult” it is for a politician to stand up to the gun lobby, it is far more difficult for a parent to bury a child, for a sister to bury a brother. Indeed, the fatal shooting of Park Ranger Anderson was a bitter reminder of the human cost of appeasing the gun lobby – the Coburn Amendment passed two years ago legalizing loaded guns in national parks.

If Dr. King were alive today, he would have led a candlelight vigil against the devastation of gun violence. If more of our political leaders had a fraction of Dr. King’s moral courage, countless lives could be saved.

The “Too Many Victims” candlelight vigils were only a beginning. Every American who is tired of cowardly politicians who dance to the NRA drummer should follow the path lit by those candles on Sunday by getting involved. Join committed Americans like Yoko Ono, Beau Bridges, Lewis Black, Plaxico Burress and Kate Walsh, who all spoke out to say there have been too many victims and the killing must stop. Go to www.bradycampaign.org and you’ll see how you can join with many thousands of other Americans to seek a safer America.

Dennis Henigan is the Acting President of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence and the author of Lethal Logic: Exploding the Myths That Paralyze American Gun Policy (Potomac Books 2009).

For most Americans, the holiday season is about the peaceful enjoyment of family and friends –those who mean the most to us in our daily lives. But even this season of peace knows no respite from the plague of gun violence. For too many Americans, this holiday season will be remembered only for the devastating sense of loss as their loved ones are torn from their lives by senseless gunfire.

In Texas, on Christmas Day, a man facing marital and financial problems shoots and kills his estranged wife, two teenage children and three other family members while dressed in a Santa Claus outfit.

In Colorado, a three-year-old accidentally shoots and kills his five-year-old playmate.

In Indiana, a 7-year-old boy is shot in the head during a Christmas celebration with his family, as shots are fired from the street outside his house.

In California, a soldier who had received a Purple Heart for his wounds in Afghanistan is shot and paralyzed during an argument over a football team.

On some level, it seems we ought not to have to confront such horror during the season of peace. But not even the most joyous time of the year can immunize us against the reality of gun tragedies. The deadly drumbeat of gun violence just goes on and on, an American tragedy of a kind and dimension unknown to other western nations. Among all the western, high-income nations of the world, 80% of gun deaths occur in the U.S., a particularly unwelcome instance of American exceptionalism.

Many thought the Tucson mass shooting of almost a year ago would rouse the Washington politicians to action. After all, one of the most admired Members of Congress – Rep. Gabrielle Giffords – was herself struck down and still struggles bravely to recover from a grievous head wound. Yet the only gun-related legislation to reach a vote in Congress since the Tucson shooting would make it easier for dangerous carriers of concealed weapons – like the Tucson shooter Jared Loughner – to carry their guns across state lines. The politicians are not listening to the voices of ordinary Americans whose families and communities have been devastated by gunfire. They hear only the intimidating voice of the gun lobby, with its finely-honed message that any demonstration of common sense on the gun issue will be met with political reprisal.

Yet this is an issue that should transcend politics. No one who hears the stories of the victims – those who survived the gunshots and those who did not – can possibly believe that gun violence is an issue to be determined by the politics of the moment. No one who hears these stories can escape the conclusion that the unnecessary loss of life and untold suffering from easy access to deadly weaponry presents not a political issue, but a moral issue. The politicians are not hearing, because they are not listening.

That’s why, on January 8, 2012, a year to the day after Tucson, Americans will join together to ensure that the voices of the victims are honored, and are heard. From San Francisco to New York, from Austin to Duluth, Americans will light a candle in remembrance of those struck down, and in protest against the callous inaction of those in power who seem able to find every flimsy excuse for national policies that guarantee that the deadly drumbeat of gun violence will go on and on. The Too Many Victims Candlelight Vigil campaign allows ordinary Americans to make a simple, yet powerful statement, that our country deserves more than cowering politicians afraid to stand up to the bullies of the gun lobby.

Our country deserves a season of peace uninterrupted by the tragic reminders that, for too many Americans, there is no peace from gun violence.

It is now almost one year since Tucson and the nation were traumatized by a gunman outside a Safeway. Six dead, including a nine-year-old girl. Thirteen wounded, including Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, whose courageous steps toward recovery inspire us all. Yet the gunfire continues, in communities across our nation. And the dying goes on.

Some would suggest that American gun violence is an intractable scourge, with obstacles to progress that are just too high and too numerous. The American people don’t believe that, not for a minute. There is no better time to make that clear than January 8, 2012, the first anniversary of the Tucson shooting.

We urge people across this nation, in cities, suburbs and small towns, to join with the Brady Campaign, and many others on that day, to stand as one to remember the victims of American gun violence and to say, with one simple act, that we will no longer tolerate the relentless loss of innocent lives to gunfire.

That simple act is to light a candle. Join us by participating in a nationwide candlelight vigil, to proclaim that there have been too many victims of gun violence for our nation to endure.

You can sign up to host a vigil in your community, or simply to participate in a vigil hosted by others, at www.toomanyvictims.org. This new website also will allow you to post a message, photo or video of a loved one you may have lost to gun violence.

Vigils are being organized in more than 20 cities and more are joining every day. Vigils will occur from coast to coast, in every region of the country.

The “Too Many Victims” Candlelight Vigil is about people. It is about the mothers and fathers, the sisters and brothers, the husbands and wives, the children and grandchildren, taken too soon. It is about the ever-mounting toll of devastated families, shattered communities, dashed and deferred dreams. It is senseless. It is unnecessary. It must be stopped.

When we declare with our lights, our prayers, and our songs on January 8, 2012, that there are too many victims of gun violence, we serve notice that we will not allow our loved ones to be forgotten. We will not allow our just cause to be shelved as “too difficult”. We will light a candle to affirm that every life is precious and worthy, and already, far too many have been lost.

If not now, when?

If not for the more than 12,000 Americans murdered with guns since Tucson, then for whom?
If not for the more than 410,000 murdered with guns since we lost John Lennon in 1980, then for whom?
If not for the more than 530,000 murdered with guns since we lost Martin Luther King, Jr. and Robert F. Kennedy in 1968, then for whom?

America, in so many ways, is a beacon of light, hope and justice to many nations throughout the world. But when it comes to gun violence, America has shined few lights and generated far too little hope for change. Our gun homicide rate is 20 times the combined rates of other western, industrialized nations. This is a uniquely American problem. It is time for Americans to insist that the time for action has come.

Please join us at www.toomanyvictims.org to be part of this effort. Help us light the way to a new American future free of gun violence. Help us send a message that there have been far too many victims. In fact, let’s send a message that one victim is too many.

On January 8, light a candle against the darkness of gun violence.

The first piece of gun-related legislation to reach a vote in Congress since the Tucson massacre has passed the House and may be taken up soon by the Senate.

Is it a bill to ban the high-capacity assault clips that allowed Jared Loughner, in a span of around sixteen seconds, to kill six people, including a nine-year-old child, and wound thirteen others, including the grievous injury to Rep. Gabrielle Giffords? No.

Is it a bill to strengthen the Brady background check system to prevent dangerous people like Jared Loughner, the Tucson shooter, from getting access to lethal weaponry? No.

The legislation recently passed by the House would allow the Jared Loughners of the world to carry their loaded, hidden handguns virtually anywhere in the country. Two days after their wounded colleague’s extraordinary courage was on display to a national audience in her first TV interview since the shooting, the House majority summoned not an ounce of courage to defy the gun lobby. No wonder the approval rating of the Congress is below 10%.

H.R. 822, which should be known as the “Packing Heat on Your Street Act,” would force states to recognize the concealed carry permits of visitors from other states, even if the visitor would be ineligible to even possess a gun in the state where the carrying occurs. Arizona’s gun laws are so nonexistent that Jared Loughner, with his history of mental problems and threatening behavior, was a legal concealed carrier until the moment he pulled the trigger outside that Tucson Safeway. He didn’t even need a permit to carry, though he could easily have obtained one from Arizona authorities. If he had, under H.R. 822 he could have carried his Glock and its 33-round assault clip into Times Square.

Even conservative Senators who aren’t troubled by the public safety danger of more people carrying concealed weapons in public places should oppose this bill. Why?

First, when it comes to gun issues, we often hear the refrain from the right, “We don’t need new laws, we need to enforce the laws we have.” Yet the “Packing Heat on Your Street Act” is a proposed new law that undercuts the authority of states to enforce their existing laws on concealed weapons. Even states that have relatively permissive concealed carry laws still have restrictions that have been built into current law in the interest of public safety.

For example, the State of Arkansas bars concealed carry by persons who have voluntarily committed themselves to a mental institution or who are chronic abusers of alcohol. Under H.R. 822, Arkansas could enforce those restrictions against its own residents, but not against visitors who have licenses to carry from states that lack the same restrictions.

Why should a state’s law be unenforceable against visitors from other states?

Second, it should make a difference to conservatives that H.R. 822 involves Congress telling states what laws they can and can’t enforce. Conservatives who generally oppose the invasion of state prerogatives by the federal government should blanch at the reach of this bill. Recently Robert VerBruggen of National Review, who thinks “concealed carry is a good idea,” nevertheless condemned H.R. 822 as “bad policy from a conservative perspective, as it tramples on states’ rights.”

As he points out, states now have concealed carry reciprocity agreements with other states, but these are voluntary agreements with other states. Reciprocity forced by the Congress, as in H.R. 822, “goes beyond the proper functions of the federal government,” according to VerBruggen.

This is why Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN) voted against H.R. 822 in the House Judiciary Committee and on the Floor, even though he wrote Tennessee’s permissive concealed carry law when he was in the state legislature. Rep. Dan Lungren (R-Cal.) was one of seven House Republicans to vote against the bill. He cited his “deep and abiding commitment to preserving states’ rights.”

But what about the Second Amendment? Proponents of H.R. 822 assert that the Second Amendment right to carry a concealed weapon should not stop at the state line and that the Constitution trumps the authority of states to enforce their own gun laws. This assertion invokes the Supreme Court’s 2008 ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller, but in defiance of what the Court actually said in Heller.

The right recognized in Justice Scalia’s majority opinion in Heller is that of “law abiding, responsible citizens to use arms in defense of hearth and home,” not the right to carry guns in public. Indeed, Justice Scalia, a conservative judicial icon and no friend of gun control, in determining that this right “is not unlimited,” used as an example the fact that “prohibitions on carrying concealed weapons” have been held lawful by courts since the 19th century.

The right to carry concealed weapons across state lines exists only in the fertile constitutional imagination of the gun lobby. Justice Scalia’s “originalism” apparently leaves no room for such a right.

Conservatives don’t have to believe that concealed carry of loaded guns in public places poses unacceptable risks, in order to be opposed to H.R. 822. Principled conservatives – even those who think concealed carry is a positive good – should be driven to the same conclusion.

Individuals from across the ideological spectrum should register their opposition to legislation like H.R. 822. Go to www.bradycampaign.org and we’ll make it easy for you.

For more information, see Dennis Henigan’s Lethal Logic: Exploding the Myths that Paralyze American Gun Policy (Potomac Books 2009)